Colonics Clean Colons But do you know where the colon is in your body?

Thank you for looking at the colons with me. I don’t expect you to learn a lot here just gaze at where colons are in the body. That’s it.

 

         

 

So big bellies equal full colons. That’s it.

 

Cannabis oil cures terminal cancer in 3-year-old after pharmaceutical drugs fail miserably

November 9, 2015 by  
Filed under Cancer, Cancer, Cannabis, CBD

Comments Off

Thanks folks I am very happy you surfed into this site.    :-D

 

A 3 year-old Utah boy, diagnosed with leukemia and told by doctors that he had mere days to live, is now alive and well not because he continued his chemotherapy, but because he obtained cannabis oil treatment instead. (1)

The family, fed up with the fact that the only treatment doctors could recommend was chemotherapy–even after little Landon Riddle kept vomiting dozens of times daily and refused to eat after two months of chemo–looked into cannabis oil treatment. After reading up about it online and researching the details, they traveled to Colorado where such a treatment is legal, to help Landon. (1)

“His whole chest was full of leukemia tumors which is why he couldn’t breathe,” says his mother, Sierra. “They started him on chemo, but told us that he probably wasn’t going to make it. We discussed all of our concerns with his medical team in Utah and watched Landon continue to suffer and wither away as the piled on drug after drug.” But rather than give in to a death sentence and play into Big Pharma’s only recommendation, Landon began cannabis oil treatments. The results have been incredible. (1)

Within just days of the treatment, Landon showed signs of improvement. Instead of withering away, his appetite surged and his vomiting lessened. He rebounded, and as explained on a CNN video, is still cancer-free even months later. (1)

The sad threat to take a sick child away from his family

Still, serious issues loom over the family, including their concern that Landon might be taken out of their custody. The video, which can be viewed in this article here, explains that the family was initially given an ultimatum: continue years of chemo and steroid treatments or refuse it, and potentially have Landon removed from their care. A lawyer willing to take on the case stepped in, expressing his thoughts that there is nothing detrimental about the family’s intentions.

And so the cannabis treatment continued, although it should be noted the chemotherapy didn’t entirely cease. He still receives treatments, but just once monthly as opposed to the more frequent doses. Sierra is desperately trying to find an oncologist who will allow cannabis treatments only, but has yet to find one willing to do so. (1)

We all know why. If the medical profession were to get on board with cannabis oiltreatments and other natural methods of curing the sick, billions of Big Pharma dollars go down the drain. It would be a huge industry shake-up where pharma jobs would go by the wayside, money lost, and credentials questioned. So medical experts, for the most part, tip-toe around the issue, saying–at best–that it should be used as a complementary approach to more accepted traditional treatment methods such as chemotherapy.

Big organizations against cannabis treatments despite growing evidence that it heals people

In a statement issued to z,i>CNN by the American Cancer Society regarding Landon Riddle’s story, the avoid-cannabis-for-improved-health mentality is blatantly obvious. They stated in the same aforementioned video that “there is no available scientific evidence from controlled studies in humans that cannabinoids can cure or treat cancer.” That, despite the fact that Dr. Julie Holland, editor of “The Pot Book,” says, “It turns out, it actually fights the cancer itself.” That, despite the fact that numerous findings have emerged showing that cannabis compounds kill cancer cells in mice and in humans. That, despite Landon’s amazing recovery. (1)

Landon’s story isn’t the first time cannabis oil has been eyed as helping those with serious conditions heal. For example, Natural News recently reported on the story of 33 year-old David Hibbitt, a U.K. resident who was diagnosed with bowel cancer and given 18 months to live. However, he took therapeutic doses of cannabis oil to the tune of a very affordable $75 monthly and guess what? He eliminated his cancer. (2)

What’s it going to take for the mainstream medical world to fight more for human health rather than Big Pharma greed? It’s time for the blinders to come off and the money-hungry mind sets to end.

(1) http://www.blacklistednews.com
(2) http://www.naturalnews.com/051009_marijuana_cancer_cure_cannabis.html

10 Benefits of Colon Cleansing

October 6, 2015 by  
Filed under Colonic Health Benefits

Comments Off

Makes the digestive system more effective

As the colon is cleansed, it pushes undigested waste through your system, clearing the way for good nutrient absorption. If waste remains in the body for too long, it becomes a breeding ground for bacteria and illness. A clean colon from a colon detox allows undigested waste to pass easily through your system.

Maintains regularity and prevents constipation

Constipation — especially when it’s chronic — causes a sluggish digestive response, which in turn leaves waste in the system longer. This increases the likelihood that toxins will be released into the bloodstream. It is also a cause of other illnesses and irritations, such as hemorrhoids and varicose veins.

Increases energy

Releasing the toxins from your body is rejuvenating because it refocuses the energy usually used for forcing waste through your intestines to other parts of your body. People who have undergone colon detoxification say they have better blood circulation, more restful sleep and a boost in energy.

Increases the body’s absorption of vitamins and nutrients

A colon that has been cleansed allows only water, vitamins and nutrients to be absorbed into the bloodstream, rather than releasing toxins and bacteria through the colon walls. When the colon is detoxified, it clears the way for essential nutrients to filter into your body unobstructed.

Improves concentration

Poor diet and ineffective vitamin absorption can cause you to become distracted and lose your concentration. The buildup of mucous and toxins in your colon can keep your body from getting what it needs to function, even if you eat a consistently healthy diet. Cleansing the colon with a detox diet can be the difference between feeling alert and not being able to focus. This has far-reaching ramifications for work, your relationships and your overall health.

Kick-starts weight loss

Foods lacking in fiber move through the digestive tract at one-quarter the pace of high-fiber choices. This slow-moving food produces excess mucous that literally sticks to the intestinal walls, weighing the intestinal tract down with pounds of decaying fecal matter.

Colon cleansing has the potential to aid weight loss; some people claim to have lost up to 20 pounds over the course of a month. The average human colon weighs about four pounds empty and can hold up to eight meals’ worth of food before digestion finally occurs. A colon cleansing can result in significant weight loss and kick-start your metabolism, as well as refocus your attention on better food choices and whole-body wellness.

Decreases risk of colon cancer

All the toxins that you eat, drink, breathe in and absorb through your skin end up being processed by your gastrointestinal system and liver. If they are not forced from your colon and liver as quickly as possible, they can wreak havoc on your body’s systems. By releasing stagnant body waste, you reduce the causes and the risk of polyps, cysts and cancerous growths in your colon and gastrointestinal tract.

Increases fertility

Colon cleansing, as well as increased fiber intake and healthy food choices, improves regularity and helps keep your weight under control. Fat is estrogen-based, and if too much is present, becoming pregnant becomes more difficult. A colon that is weighed down by years of buildup can also press on the uterus and surrounding reproductive organs in women, causing strain.

Colon cleansing rids the body of many chemicals and toxins that affect the egg and sperm. Many naturopaths recommend that both partners undergo colon cleansing before attempting pregnancy.

Maintains pH balance in the bloodstream

Foods that cause colon blockages are acid-forming — particularly high-protein diets without enough fiber. This leads to general malaise in the body. The tissue of the colon eventually becomes diseased and inflamed, reducing the colon’s ability to do its job, which is to allow only water, minerals and vitamins to pass into the bloodstream. If yeasts, molds, fungus, bacteria, parasites or fecal material enter the bloodstream and connected tissue, the body’s pH will be thrown out of balance.

Improves whole-body well-being

Ridding the colon of waste and toxins by releasing layers of colon buildup can lead to feelings of lightness, strength and overall good health.

Cancer? This is why Western Medical Has no Interest in Helping educate Cancer Patients

February 24, 2015 by  
Filed under Cancer

Comments Off

CANCER ORGANIZATIONS  THAT WOULD CLOSE IF MAINSTREAMERS  FOUND OUT CANCER IS TOXICITY

21st Century Oncology

Abbott Laboratories, Inc.

Advertising Council, Inc.

Aetna

Alliance for Excellent Education

American Association of Cancer Education

American Association for Cancer Research

American Association of Medical Colleges

American Cancer Society

American Childhood Cancer Organization

American College of Surgeons/Commission on Cancer

American Society of Clinical Oncology

America’s Health Insurance Plans

Arizona State University

Association of American Cancer Institutes

Association of Community Cancer Centers

Association of Oncology Social Work

Association of State & Territorial Health Officials

Astellas Pharma US, Inc.

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals

Austin/Travis County Health and Human Services

Department

Avon Foundation

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Brodeur Worldwide

Bronson Healthcare Group

Brown University Graduate School

California Department of Health Services

Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids

Canadian Partnership Against Cancer

Cancer Institute of New Jersey

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas

Cancer Registry of Northern California

Cancer Support Community

Capture Rx

CareMetx

Case Management Society of America

CEO Roundtable on Cancer, Inc.

Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center

Cherokee Nation Health Services

City of Hope National Medical Center

CMI Communications/ ANEW Marketing Group

Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups

Coalition to Transform Advanced Care (C-TAC)

Colon Cancer Alliance

Comprehensive Cancer Control Board

Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Department of Health, State of Hawaii

Duke University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Duke University Men’s Basketball

Dutchess County Department of Health

Edelman

Education Network to Advance Cancer

Clinical Trials

Eli Lilly and Company

Endo Pharmaceuticals

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Friends of Cancer Research

Geisinger Health System

George Washington University School of

Medicine and Health Sciences

Georgetown University

Georgia State University

Georgia Tech – College of Management

GlaxoSmithKline

Grant Group, LLC

Greater Baltimore Medical Center

Hamot Medical Center

Harold Freeman Patient Navigation Institute

Harvard Medical School

Hatteras Venture Partners

Healthcare Service Corporation

Highmark Inc.

Hogan Lovells US LLP

Howard University Cancer Center

I’m Too Young For This! Cancer Foundation

Indiana University

Infectious Disease Society of America

INOVA Health System

Institute for Alternative Futures

Institute of Medicine/National Academy of Sciences

Integris Health

Intercultural Cancer Council

International Myeloma Foundation

Intrexon Corporation

Iowa Cancer Consortium

Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions

Johnson & Johnson

LEGACY | for Longer Healthier Lives

Leukemia & Lymphoma Society

Life Beyond Cancer Foundation

LIVESTRONG

Loma Linda University

Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research

Lung Cancer Alliance

Lymphoma Foundation of America

Maine Center for Cancer Medicine

Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

McCarthy Medical Marketing, Inc.

MedTran Health Strategies

Melanoma International Foundation

Men’s Health Network

Merck Vaccines

Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company

Miller Stephens & Associates

Milliman, Inc.

Mitchell Cancer Institute – University of South Alabama

Molecular Health Inc.

Morra Communications

Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Mutual of America

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

National Association of Chronic Disease Directors

National Association of City & County Health Officials

National Association of Hispanic Nurses

National Breast Cancer Foundation

National Cancer Policy Forum

National Center for Policy Analysis

National Coalition on Health Care

National Coalition of Oncology Nurse Navigators

National Forum for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention

National Health Council

National Hospital and Palliative Care Organization

National Patient Advocate Foundation

National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship

N. E. Lins & Associates

North American Association of Central Cancer Registries

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.

Office of President George H.W. Bush

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Oncology Nursing Society

Oncolytics Biotech Inc.

Ovarian Cancer National Alliance

Pfizer Pharmaceuticals

Prevencion, Inc.

Prevent Cancer Foundation

Prevention Institute

Preventive Health Partnership

Purdue Pharma, L.P.

RCY Medicine

Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of

Northwestern University

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Samaritin Health Initiatives

Samuelson and Associates

Sanofi

State Farm Insurance Companies

Strategic Health Concepts

Susan G. Komen for the Cure

Tennessee Department of Health

Texas A&M Health Science Center

Thomas Jefferson University

Translating Research Across Communities (TRAC)

Troy and Dollie Smith Cancer Center, Integris Baptist

Medical Center

Trust for America’s Health

Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine

Tyco International

UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center and Career Research Institute

United Healthcare

University of California at San Francisco

University of California Los Angeles

University of Chicago Medical Center

University of Colorado Cancer Center

University of Hawaii – John A. Burns School of Medicine

University of Kentucky

University of Maryland, School of Public Policy

University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center

University of North Carolina Health Care System

University of Notre Dame

University of Southern California

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

University of Texas – M.D. Anderson Center

University of Utah

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

U.S. Department of Agriculture

U.S. Department of Defense

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration

U.S. National Cancer Institute

U.S. Senate

US Oncology-McKesson

Van Andel Research Institute

Vital Options International

Volunteer State Medical Association

West Virginia University

Yale University School of Medicine      

This is just the people in cancer support imagine all the white coats too.     

The FDA’s Denial Of Cancer Patients’ Freedom Of Choice

February 6, 2015 by  
Filed under Cancer, Colon Cancer, Enema

Comments Off

:lol: Hello Folks thank you for clicking into this site! :lol:

 

Jonathan Emord

 

In the recently published report by the National Cancer Institute, Surveillance Epidemiology End Results (SEER) Cancer Statistics Review, nearly one out of every two Americans born today will be diagnosed with cancer. If you are diagnosed with terminal cancer, you will likely discover sooner or later that FDA approved treatments (radiation and chemotherapy) are rarely curative and ordinarily present risks of secondary cancers and other life threatening complications. You will also discover that, with rare exception, those who go without FDA approved treatments live as long, if not longer than those who receive approved treatments.When a cancer patient who is bereft of options contacts the sponsor of a clinical trial involving an experimental drug, he or she will come to a startling realization: it is neither the patient nor the patient’s doctor who decides what treatment they can use, but the Food and Drug Administration. Imagine that, after all a patient has endured, with precious little time left, and with a potential cure seemingly within reach, the terminally ill cancer patient cannot receive a desired treatment unless the FDA deems it permissible.A recent released documentary film by Nehst Out entitled Cut Poison Burn (available at cutpoisonburn.com) reveals the desperate and horrible circumstances befalling those who must not only struggle to fight the cancer afflicting them but also the FDA. The film documents the struggles of the Navarro’s, a family struggling against the cancer treatment establishment and the FDA to gain access to a promising, experimental treatment for their young son, Thomas, who was dying from an aggressive glioblastoma or brain tumor. Their extraordinary courage and stamina against nearly insurmountable odds led them into an heroic conflict with an FDA more interested in protecting economic interests and its own power than in permitting a young child and his parents hope in the fight for their beautiful little boy’s life.The Cost ofthe War on CancerSince President Nixon declared war on cancer in 1971, conventional cancer treatment has become very big business. In 2010, cancer care cost the American public an estimated $125 billion, yet even with a declared war and enormous expenditures, almost all cancer patients have died either from the treatments administered or from cancer progression, or both. The ugly truth is that the federal government has lost the war on cancer. Although it has lost the war, it compels Americans to purchase the same failed treatments for the disease by locking promising experimental alternatives out of the marketplace.

Because half the American population is bound to contract cancer and most cancers are incurable, a just government would do everything in its power to ensure that those diagnosed with cancer would be informed of and encouraged to explore alternatives, provided they made a knowing election once informed of the potential risks and known benefits of each option as compared to the FDA approved treatment. However, that is not the case. For those who seek alternatives to FDA approved treatments and to FDA favored drug manufacturers, the agency has an all too common answer: No (and often “no” without any rational explanation).

The FDA jealously guards its gatekeeper role, whereby drugs are only allowed to be marketed if they have been given FDA approval. As FDA’s Associate Director of the Office of Drug Safety, David J. Graham, has explained, the system for allowing access is corrupt, heavily subject to political influence, and biased in favor of drug company sponsors who have a cozy relationship with the FDA from years of seeking and obtaining drug approvals.

When a patient seeks an experimental drug for a serious or life-threatening condition, an ordeal of extraordinary proportions may confront the person when they are least able, physically and emotionally, to endure it. He or she must contact the drug trial sponsor and obtain the sponsor’s consent for admission to the trial. If the patient does not meet the eligibility criteria for the clinical trial, then the sponsor, not the patient, if convinced of the prudence of admitting the patient must seek the FDA’s consent for a “compassionate use” exemption from the eligibility criteria. That exemption comes in the form of either a “single patient investigational new drug” submission by the sponsor or, if the patient may die imminently, an “emergency investigational new drug” submission (which may be made by phone). FDA political appointees exercise enormous subjective discretion in determining who will be permitted access to a clinical trial of an experimental cancer drug. Although the agency is loath to admit it, denial of the patient’s choice occurs in those instances where the FDA harbors a bias against the sponsor or the treatment. Sometimes that bias is born of good evidence that the clinical trial is fraudulent or that the experimental drug is too dangerous, but it may also be born of an agency effort to ensure that favored regulatees are protected against new or novel cancer treatments of promise from an individual or company not among those having close ties to the agency.

The decision to deny a dying patient access to an experimental drug is an extraordinary exercise of federal power. That horrific decision is made daily by the directors of FDA’s Division of Oncology Products—Drs. Robert Justice and Patricia Keegan, under the direct supervision of the FDA Commissioner, Margaret Hamburg. The FDA has criteria in 21 C.F.R. § 312.305 that limit access, but it exercises considerable discretion in interpreting the criteria, resulting in inconsistent decision making. Repeatedly members of Congress, most notably Congressman Dan Burton from Indiana and Congressman Peter DeFazio from Oregon, have pressured FDA Commissioners to reverse decisions denying access that the Oncology Products Division Directors declared final. While FDA Commissioners protest that their decisions are wholly science based, in fact the subjective criteria and the inconsistencies in decision prove that bias is the norm and that those with political access to the powerful can achieve reversals.

When determining if a patient will be given access to a clinical trial, the FDA considers a few subjective factors. First, it requires that the patient have a “serious or immediately life-threatening disease” that is essentially not treatable with FDA approved drugs and devices. In 21 C.F.R. § 312. 300(b), the FDA reveals the inherent subjectivity in this determination: “Whether a disease or condition is serious is a matter of clinical judgment, based on its impact on such key factors as survival, day-to-day functioning, or the likelihood that the disease if left untreated will progress from a less severe condition to a more serious one.” Next, the FDA evaluates the treatment, again on largely subjective grounds, assessing whether “[t]he potential patient benefit justifies the potential risks of the treatment use and those potential risks are not unreasonable in the context of the disease or condition to be treated.” The FDA then insinuates its anti-competitive bias into the process, deeming even a drug for which clinicians recommend access for the terminally ill be kept from those patients on the basis that allowing the use would “interfere with” potential FDA market approval for the drug or because the FDA deems other drugs under another IND (Investigational New Drug Application) or FDA approved drug protocol available for treatment use.

When the drug sponsor is a large pharmaceutical company having a portfolio of several FDA approved drugs seeks a compassionate use exemption, it is ordinarily granted. The subjective factors are all resolved in the sponsor’s favor. When the drug sponsor lacks that cozy relationship, the FDA often subjectively concludes the treatment to be one with potential risks that are unreasonable or concludes the condition to be one for which FDA approved treatments remain available. It is, of course, always the case that an FDA approved treatment is available for cancer or that another IND by a favored regulatee is available for treatment use. The factor is thus entirely fungible, depending on the political preference of the regulator. Chemotherapy, radiation and surgery are conventionally approved to one extent or another for every cancer. So the FDA may always conclude that an experimental treatment is unwarranted because the patient could receive treatments that are FDA approved instead or could participate in some other IND for the cancer.

The FDA’s political manipulation of the compassionate use process is one of the greatest examples of arbitrary and capricious agency action. It carries with it consequences acceptable to no one but the FDA bureaucrats who administer the program: destruction of patient hope and life. When a director of the Division of Oncology Products decides to deny a terminally ill patient access to an experimental treatment, that interposition of federal power between doctor and patient has profound consequences. Invariably the patient’s last, best hope for cure is removed by force of law, compelling the patient either to leave the country in search of the same or comparable treatments, return to horrific chemotherapy and radiation treatments that will make life unbearable and may hasten death, or resign to die.

Patricia Clarkson’s Story

On June 17, 2011, Patricia Clarkson was diagnosed with Stage III multiple myeloma. Although predicting an individual’s life expectancy is in fact impossible, Patricia’s doctor, like many oncologists and hematologists, make those unscientific predictions. Her doctor told her that she had no more than 4 to 5 years of life left. This common practice is not only unscientific but also cruel in the extreme and contrary to medical ethics because it inflicts injury, often causing the patient diagnosed with cancer to experience a profound loss of hope and a feeling of utter helplessness, conditioning them to accept with resignation whatever treatment regimen is recommended even treatments with lethal side effects. Often patients diagnosed with cancer and given an estimate of time left suffer a loss of the will to live and a diminution in their immune system that hastens death.

Patricia underwent a battery of tests, two MRIs, bone scans, and sophisticated laboratory analyses, all confirming the diagnosis of Stage III multiple myeloma. On June 18, 2011, she was hospitalized for sudden acute kidney failure, but she responded well to treatment and was released on June 21. While hospitalized, she was placed on Velcade, a chemotherapy drug. The Velcade reduced her plasma tumors from 80% to 15%, but she began to experience gastroenterological reactions to the drug and severe pain in her lower back.

She was then given radiation therapy. Her reactions to the Velcade became so severe that her treatment regimen was halted, pending resolution of the reactions. In the interim, one of her oncologists advised that genetic testing revealed that she was missing chromosome 13 and gene p53 (a condition common among 50% of those afflicted with multiple myeloma), which he said would reduce her life expectancy to a year or two. Again, this heartless, unscientific pronouncement only further injured Patricia’s psyche atop the enormous physical suffering she had already experienced.

This oncologist recommended a bone marrow transplant which he said would extend her life one to two years (another unscientific prediction because bone marrow transplants in these circumstances are notoriously unsuccessful). Fortunately, Patricia did her own research on bone marrow transplantation and decided that the length of hospital stay, risk of complications, and likely need for more than one transplantation surgery made it a foolish option.

In late November 2011, convinced that there was no conventional option that offered her any hope and that each option given her would come with greater physical disability and pain, decreasing, not increasing, her life expectancy, Patricia began looking for non-conventional alternatives. Having discussed the matter with trusted friends, she became convinced that she might benefit from receiving antineoplastons, a non-toxic, experimental drug discovered over thirty years ago by medical researcher Dr. Stanislaus Burzynski. One of those friends, Mary Jo Siegel, was diagnosed twenty years before with non-Hodgkins lymphoma and was pronounced cured following receipt of the antineoplastons treatment. Patricia traveled to Houston to meet Dr. Burzynski. He regretfully informed her that the FDA had ruled that it would not grant any additional compassionate use exemptions for patients to receive his antineoplatons, even though the FDA had approved numerous exemptions in 2011. After conducting a physical exam and evaluating the test results, Dr. Burzynski recommended that Patricia take sodium phenylbutyrate along with the chemotherapy drug Revlimid until such time as a better option became available. Her local oncologist acknowledged Patricia’s decision to work with Dr. Burzynski, but refused to affiliate with him or provide local medical support, apparently for fear of FDA retaliation against her and her clinic.

Informed that the FDA could only be persuaded to lift its ban on Burzynski’s treatment if enough political pressure were brought to bear, Patricia contacted her member of Congress, Jerry McNerney. In December McNerney’s aides sent Erik Laughner, a consumer safety officer in the FDA’s Division of Oncology Products, a letter requesting a compassionate exemption for Patricia. The request was denied. The FDA offered no explanation for its denial. Patricia then turned to Senator Diane Feinstein for help. She wrote to the Senator and asked her to urge the FDA to permit participation in the Burzynski clinical trial. Senator Feinstein’s staff sent a letter to the FDA on December 14. On January 6, 2012, the FDA responded with a conclusory denial, reciting that it was aware of no data supporting “the use of antineoplaston therapy as a potentially safe and effective treatment for multiple myeloma.”

Patricia then met with Senator Feinstein’s aides and provided them with more details supporting her request for access to the Burzynski treatment. Dan Morrison of Senator Feinstein’s office later informed Patricia that he did not receive any response to his last inquiry to the FDA. He had no options to give Patricia other than encouraging her to contact the FDA directly by phone (a dead end given that FDA refuses to speak with patients about its compassionate use decisions; it only speaks to its regulatees, the clinical trial sponsors) or send a letter to the White House.

Get Involved

For Patricia Clarkson, the need for access to Dr. Burzynski’s antineoplastons is acute. Because political influence plays such an important part in this sordid business of convincing the FDA to permit a dying person freedom of choice,

I urge those who read these words to correspond with the FDA and with their members of Congress to demand that FDA Commissioner Hamburg act now to reverse the FDA’s decision to deny Patricia Clarkson antineoplastons treatment. You may register your complaint with Commissioner Margaret Hamburg at the following email address: Margaret.Hamburg@ fda.hhs.gov. You should also ask Congressman Darrell Issa, Chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, to demand that Commissioner Hamburg reverse her the denial of treatment. You can reach him on Twitter (@DarrellIssa). You should also ask Congressman Dan Burton, member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, to intervene on Patricia’s behalf. You can reach him on Twitter (@RepDanBurton).

The war on cancer has become a war dominated by “friendly fire,” where the medical troops fighting the battle more often than not kill the civilian patients they are supposed to protect. It is a war we have lost yet continue to wage using the same failed methods. It is a war the federal government allows to be waged by those with political influence but not by those without that influence who nevertheless have discovered treatments that hold out promise. It is a very corrupt and inhumane war.

Sources:

http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006/results_ merged/sect_02_all_sites.pdf

http://cutpoisonburn.com

Jonathan W. Emord is a constitutional and administrative lawyer in Washington, D.C. The author of The Rise of Tyranny and Global Censorship of Health Information, he has defeated the FDA in federal court eight times. He is a weekly columnist for both the Newswithviews.com and the American Justice column in USA Today Magazine. He is consulted regularly by the national media on government regulation, appearing on the nationally syndicated radio program Coastto- Coast AM, was recently interviewed by John Stossel on The Stossel Show (http:// www.foxbusiness.com/on-air/stossel/ blog/2011/11/08/fda-kills) and can be heard on the Christian Broadcasting Network, among media outlets. For more information visit www.Emord.org.

 

Natural ways to treat disease LOVE – EVOLVE – TRANSCEND

October 19, 2014 by  
Filed under Cancer, Cancer

Comments Off

Thank you peeps! :lol:                                                                                                                                              I came across this ……. 

No Cure for CANCER? NONSENSE!!

CLICK ON THE LINK AND SEE SOME OTHER BELIEF SYSTEMS.

 IF YOU BELIEVE SOMETHING,  YOU MAY WANT TO MAKE SURE YOU MADE IT UP.

IF NOT YOU’RE JUST TAKING SOMEONE ELSE’S BELIEF AND OWNING IT AS YOUR OWN.IN MOST CASES

NOT GOOD…               

  https://sites.google.com/site/religionsciencevsfaith/no-cure-for-cancer-nonsense   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NON GMO PROJECT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT SITE YOU WILL WANT TO FIND, UNLESS YOU JUST LIKE TO EAT POISONED FOOD

September 29, 2014 by  
Filed under GMO

Comments Off

:-P  Thank you gentlemen and gentlewomen !

Monsanto  

https://www.google.com/search?q=monsanto&espv=2&biw=1280&bih=631&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ei=U2QpVKsfocbxAZCNgKgE&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAg

poisons our food because they’re also pharmaceutical producers. You eat their shit, you get sick, you buy their drugs, that’s as simple as I can make it for you.

If you want to be one of the ones standing, not in a wheelchair, get very familiar with this site;

http://www.nongmoproject.org/find-non-gmo/search-participating-products/browse-products-by-brand/

and this one

http://seedsofdeception.com/

Oh, and when you do get sick as a direct result from eating carcinogenic GMO foods from Monsanto group, you go to sue the company for producing foods that immediately cause tumors, you can’t because they quietly passed the

“MONSANTO PROTECTION ACT”.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/11/monsanto-protection-act-extension_n_3908249.html

You probably don’t know that, so you bring them to court and guess who you will find as your judge?

Image from "A Sheep No More"

http://theprogressivecynic.com/2013/07/15/justice-clarence-thomas-and-monsanto/

This fat  cat has been waiting for you. He is solidly married and sleeps together with the Monsanto group as he is old pals with them. He protected them as their lawyer. Do you think there is a tiny, teeny, weeny, slight conflict of interest there folks?

Find retailers that keep that garbage out of the store shelves

http://www.nongmoproject.org/find-non-gmo/search-retailer-endorsers/

Top Docs Twisting The “C” word into Radical Remission

July 13, 2014 by  
Filed under Cancer

Comments Off

;-) Thank you so much for clicking in! :-D

There were too many guest speakers at the Los Angeles Colonic Therapist Convention this year to write about all of them,  however , here are two ;

Turn your challenge into radical remission!

check out her site

http://cancercenterforhope.com/

Dr.Leigh Erin Connealy, M.D.

NEXT IS

Healing From Within

dr_habib_sadeghi_be_hive

Dr. Habib Sadeghi, D.O.

The Doctor’s web site is

http://behiveofhealing.com/team-view/dr-habib-sadeghi-d-o/

Even the Healthiest of us Need to Detox

March 3, 2014 by  
Filed under Detox, Misc. Posts

Comments Off

Detoxification – An Essential Process

Detoxification is a buzzword we hear more and more recently, especially in Complementary and Alternative Medicine circles. But what does detoxification actually mean and is it even worth your time to think about it?

Well yes, it probably is because the world we live in is so filled with toxicants (commonly called “toxins”) that even the strongest and healthiest among us are being assaulted every day with chemicals that our bodies must cope with (detoxify and remove) in order for us to survive. If our load of poisons is more than we (or each of our particular genetics) can handle, then this toxic exposure will eventually make us sick or could eventually even kill us. Our bodies, through normal operation, produce a base load of toxins that we need to process to keep functioning. We do have a capacity to detoxify more, but even if you happen to be extraordinarily careful and try to avoid every toxin in the world, there will come a time when you are accidentally exposed to a dose of some kind of toxic substance. Your body must detoxify all of these toxins in order for you to maintain your health.

Fortunately, our bodies have ways of handling foreign contaminants, primarily through the liver and kidneys. Clearing out toxic substances is known as detoxification, and our bodies are pretty good at it most of the time. But, there are some cases when your body needs just a little bit of help.

How can we help our bodies to detoxify and is it worth the bother?

THE HISTORY OF TOXINS

We, as humans, evolved to be able to handle certain problematic substances that are in our environment or diet (infections, injury, animal bites, and poisonous plants were the primary toxins we dealt with for most of our evolution).

Humans eventually started mining our own toxic substances. A good early example of this is the mining and using heavy metals like lead. During the Roman Empire people used make up and even “health” supplements created using lead, which caused significant illness in those exposed. Humans also experimented with toxic substances using them for manufacturing (e.g. using mercury to make men’s top-hats, leading to the now familiar description of top-hat manufacturers as “Mad as a Hatter”).

But the last 100 – 200 years has seen an explosion in the development and use of new and particularly dangerous toxic substances. This is primarily because chemistry has matured and humans learned how to assemble all kinds of “useful” chemicals. Unfortunately, many of these chemicals are also very toxic and often make us sick. From pesticides to industrial waste products, the amount of toxins we are exposed to is staggering.

HOW DOES YOUR BODY REMOVE TOXINS?

To simplify a very complicated subject, there are only a few ways our body can actually remove toxins from itself. The number 1 and 2 ways are pretty obvious (i.e. urination and defecation). Of course, If you’ve ever been sick with a stomach “bug”, you are probably well acquainted with another, more extreme route — nausea and vomiting clears out your stomach contents very quickly taking any toxins you ingested along with it. Another, less expected, way of removing toxins from our body is sweating, where the moisture and salts in our skin literally “pull” the toxins out with them. Another method of toxin removal, you may not give much thought to, is respiration. A good example of this is that every minute we breathe out excess carbon dioxide (a toxin for us).

Finally, if your body can’t get rid of a toxin through any of these means, it will simply wall off the offending material. The problem with this last method is that the inflammation needed to wall of a toxic substance (let’s say asbestos) leads to the formation of very fibrous scar tissue. This scar tissue often is created exactly where you don’t want it, like your lungs or your arteries. This is why there was so much litigation around asbestos exposure. The body would wall off the dangerous asbestos molecules causing severe lung scarring (asbestosis) because our bodies cannot “detoxify” asbestos in any other way.

FAT AND WATER

The liver processes fat soluble toxins
so that they can be eliminated
through your intestines as bile.

Toxins fall into two broad categories, fat soluble and water soluble. This means that a given chemical can only really be stored in fat or water, but usually not both. For instance, vitamins A, D, E, and K are fat soluble, so they are stored in fat cells in your body, the liver specifically. While vitamins are not toxins, it illustrates how things can be stored and transported in the body. Because they need fat to make their way into your body, this is why many supplements are supposed to be taken with a meal.

The body uses two different approaches to remove toxins from our bodies:

Fat soluble toxins are removed by the liver through the production of bile (a digestive enzyme the liver produces) and releases it into the small intestine during digestion. Once there, it is absorbed by the fiber in your diet, and safely pushed through until you deposit it in the toilet. This is one of the big reasons why fiber is so important in your diet; without enough of it, the toxins can be reabsorbed through your intestine into your body and must be processed out again.

The kidney removes water
soluble toxins.

Water soluble toxins have a number of different ways of being detoxified and removed by our bodies. After the liver processes them into (slightly) safer versions, the “tagged” toxins travel through your bloodstream until they reach the kidneys. Once in the kidneys, the chemical tag the liver put on the toxin is recognized by the cells there and the tagged toxins are moved through to the bladder, where you can pee them out safely. This is why urine tests are so useful for recognizing imbalances in chemicals in your body, as many chemicals are removed this way if they are in excess or there is some other problem. This is also why urine tests are used to detect the “metabolites” (chemicals produced in breaking down a substance) of drugs, legal or otherwise.

THE LIVER

The “go to” organ for dealing with things that don’t belong in your body is the liver. Your liver plays a number of crucial roles in your system especially the immune system, well as regulating levels of a large number of hormones and other chemicals (e.g. vitamins, blood sugar levels) that, if out of balance, could be considered toxic. Your liver is also one of the main places that medications and other drugs are broken down so that they can be removed from your body. On top of all this, the liver both aids in digestion (by producing bile to help digest fats) and sends out processed waste for removal. There are two major steps in processing toxins.

 

The cytochrome system is an extremely complex set of enzymes that perform a remarkable number of reactions in virtually every cell in your body. When your liver encounters a toxin, the cytochrome system is the first line of defense that springs into action. There are about 100 enzymes involved in this process, and they essentially convert anything they can into water-soluble chemicals that can be removed by (primarily) your kidneys.

The major detox pathways and what supports them.

Anything the cytochrome enzymes can’t convert into specifically a water-soluble chemical is transformed into a type called a reactive form, called a “free radical”. This means that an oxygen atom is tagged onto it, making it potentially more harmful, except that it then becomes a target for anti-oxidants in your body.

Glutathione

One of the most powerful anti-oxidants found in the body is a chemical called glutathione. Glutathione is found in our diet and also naturally produced by your body. It is found in fruits, vegetables, fish, and meat. It is a pretty simple compound made up of three amino acids — cysteine, glutamic acid, and glycine. Even though it is found in a number of foods, supplementing glutathione directly does not appear to be effective, since the body can’t absorb it very well in the intestines. You can, however, supplement the levels of the amino acids it is made up of (cysteine, glutamic acid, and glycine) to allow your body to produce more as it is needed. Glutathione is the main way that our bodies remove heavy metals and many fat-soluble toxins, by binding with them and making the water-soluble for the kidney to remove.

Glutathione is also one of the major ways your body processes toxins after the cytochrome system is done working on them. The cytochrome system generates a lot of “free radicals” (chemicals that can cause DNA damage as well as physical damage to many cells in the body) when processing toxins. In order to “fix” these free radicals generated from the cytochrome system, glutathione is essential. If your body runs out of glutathione because of a particularly strong or chronic exposure to toxins, these dangerous forms of toxins (free radicals) can cause significant damage.

WHAT CAN I DO TO REMOVE TOXINS FROM MY BODY?

While there are many things you can do to increase toxin removal, there are some small changes that make a big difference.

First, avoid taking in the toxins in to your body to begin with: For example, eating organic food instead of conventionally farmed foods can remove almost all synthetic pesticides getting into your body. This alone greatly reduces the toxic load that your body must process, not to mention avoiding the nasty side effects of pesticides overall. Other important toxins to avoid are Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) like formaldehyde.

Second, eat more fiber: Since fiber helps to remove fat soluble toxins in your intestines (released as bile) while also preventing them from being reabsorbed, increasing your fiber intake can reduce the burden of having to reprocess the toxins that don’t get a chance to clear and are reabsorbed.

Charcoal appears to act in a similar fashion to fiber in this regard, absorbing and binding with potentially dangerous chemicals and poisons; this is why when someone accidentally ingests a poison, doctors may recommend taking activated charcoal, as it helps neutralize many different kinds of poisons. Products like Takesumi Supreme (finely ground carbonized bamboo) do this remarkably well, and are a safe way that I use to help my body remove potential toxins. Originally developed and sold in Japan, Takesumi can be used in water or even added to baked goods as a source of fiber, as many Japanese bakeries do. Takesumi is an extremely gentle and safe method for removing excessive heavy metals. It can be particularly helpful in removing mercury in people who have problems associated with excessive mercury buildup in their bodies.

Supplements

In addition to these changes, you could also consider taking some supplements to support the systems that work to keep you toxin-free. The best supplements to help your body remove toxins are those that act as anti-oxidants or in some way enhance the production of glutathione. These include:

  • Vitamin C
  • Vitamin E
  • Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA)
  • Selenium (found in onions, broccoli, and Brazil nuts)
  • S-adenosylmethione (SAMe)
  • amino acids like cysteine, glutamic acid, and glycine (which make up glutathione)
  • Milk Thistle (helps produce glutathione)

CONCLUSION

It is important to remember that the toxins in your environment are not the only ones that your body processes. There are waste products in your metabolism that need to be processed out as well, such as hormones, ammonia (from breaking down proteins), and many others. In addition, the liver processes certain things we eat in exactly the same way as toxins, such as ethanol (from alcoholic beverages) and fructose (half of ordinary table sugar). but it can also degrade the performance of the liver removing other toxins.

When you add the load of environmental toxins, your body’s natural detoxification system can easily get overwhelmed. Knowing how to decrease your toxic load and increase your body’s ability to replenish its defenses is a key part of maintaining optimum health

Some People Work Tirelessly To Gag & Suppress Natural Healing Practitioners in USA & Erode all Rights to choose what Health Care we Want

August 8, 2012 by  
Filed under Misc. Posts, Monopoly Medicine

Comments Off

Thank you for visiting us! :-o

 

In case your not aware of it, T.V., Radio, newspapers, magazines & other traditional, mainstream venues are mostly propaganda bought by drug company’s. How? They crept in and bought all or most of the advertising. Then a network owner has to advertise what the drug companys agree with, or they threaten to pull all advertising dollars. Since the majority of dollars rule, your information venue gets tainted with drug company agendas.

That said, I give you links to a E-zine by “Health Keepers”. Health Keepers is produced by a woman, Julie Whitman Kline. She owns a college that teaches us how to help people heal themselves without drugs, surgery, or injections. Julie & her writers, produce a magazine each quarter with valuable healthcare freedom information, or I should “The LOSS of Valuable  Health Care Freedom” information.

The links below will take you to the information that will expose what the  drug companys, our government, the American Medical Association are doing “Behind” your backs.  There is also very useful Natural health care information, written by the worlds most informative Natural Paths. Some of the writers are the teaches for the school and have been for decades.  You will be amazed at the information in these pages.  To find out what is happening to your health care freedom in “YOUR” state, just click on the links below:

Table of Contents; under “Departments”; Then “Legislative Updates” 

April 2012:                  http://pubs.royle.com/publication/?i=107864

December 2011:        http://pubs.royle.com/publication/?i=92002

August 2011:              http://www.onlinedigitalpublishing.com/publication/?i=78726

March 2011:               http://digital.ipcprintservices.com/publication/?i=63776 

October 2010:             http://digital.ipcprintservices.com/publication/?i=49743

Winter 2010:               http://digital.ipcprintservices.com/publication/?i=32687 

Fall 2009:                     http://digital.ipcprintservices.com/publication/?i=24606

Summer 2009:            http://digital.ipcprintservices.com/publication/?i=20642

Sping 2009:                  http://digital.ipcprintservices.com/publication/?i=24607

and remember ……….

Only western medicine must be administered at gunpoint!

Of all the systems of medicine that exist around the world (Ayurvedic medicine, Amazon rainforest medicine, Aboriginal medicine, Tibetan medicine, Chinese medicine, etc.), Conventional Western Medicine CWM) is the ONLY system so dangerous, deadly and unwelcomed that it must be administered under the threat of imprisonment.

 

 

 

Next Page »